Maddening City Directories

FIRST QUESTION.

Is the year part of a directory title?

When the title page has something like:

The                                                                                                                                                             Everett                                                                                                                                                       Directory                                                                                                                                                    Containing                                                                                                                                                  Alphabetical List of the Inhabitants and Business Firms.                                                                                1906.

I think of the title as including the year, and therefore I would put "The Everett Directory, ... 1906" in my reference note.

What about when the year is at the very top of the title page:

1886.                                                                                                                                                               Everett                                 Directory,                                                                                                                                                   of the                                                                                                                                              Inhabitants, Institutions, Manufacturing Establishments, Business, Societies, Business Firms, &c.

It still seems okay to me to treat the year as being part of the title and, thus, having a reference note that includes "1886 Everett Directory" (eliminating the period after the year).

But what about:

1908.                                                                                                                                                       The                                                                                                                                                             Everett                                                                                                                                                       Diretory [etc.]

"1908 The Everett Directory" just doesn't look right.  What would you suggest in this circumstance? "The [1908] Everett Directory"?

SECOND QUESTIONS

It seems as if the past city directory publishers changed titles ever so slightly almost every year just to annoy us.  That leads me to ask several questions.

I saw in EE 12.56 that if the directories "have the same compiler and publisher across a span of years, with slight variation in titles, you might use this approach:

Source List Entry

Jones, John Q., compiler. Badlands City Directory, with Listings for Adjacent Wetlands, Marshlands, and Arid City [varying subtitles]. Badlands: Jones Press, 1924-27."

Since I can't find those books online to see what the actual titles are, I can't tell whether you are indicating (1) that Badlands City Directory, with Listings for Adjacent Wetlands, Marshlands, and Arid City is at the beginning of all the titles, with following subtitles that vary, or (2) that Badlands City Directory, with Listings for Adjacent Wetlands, Marshlands, and Arid City is essentially the complete title of the directories (title and subtitles together) with the actual words varying, your having chosen one of the complete titles as a representative title or your having used some of the words in all the book names to come up with a representative combination sample.

1. Long and short of it, if I wanted a citation that was similar to your suggestion, i.e., that didn't just say Everett Directory, but had some of the rest of the words in the titles of the directories below, how would I do it in an effort to combine the following (differences being shown in bold):

1891. Everett Directory, of the Inhabitants, Institutions, Manufacturing Establishments, Business, Business Firms, Societies, &c.

1886. Everett Directory, of the Inhabitants, Institutions, Manufactring Establishments, Business Firms, Business, Societies, &c.

1884. Everett Directory, of the Inhabitants, Institutions, Manufacturing Establishments, Business, Societies, Business Firms, &c.

The Everett Directory, for the Year 1908, of the Inhabitants, Institutions, Manufacturing Establishments, Business, Business Firms, Societies, Etc.

2. For purposes of EE 12.56, when do directories have the same compiler?  Can I treat W.A. Greenough, W. A. Greenough & Co., and Greenough & Co. as the same compiler? If so, what would I use in the citation?

3. May one do a combination as in EE 12.56 if the digital images are from different websites? For example, is the following citation acceptable:

The Henry M. Meek Publishing Co., The Everett Directory (Salem, Massachusetts: The Henry M. Meek Publishing Co., 1904), 241; also subsequent years by the same title: (1906) 265, (1908), 289; entry for Gilman C. Hickok; digital images, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 3 November 2012) (1904) and Google books (http://books.google.com : accessed 28 October 2012) (1906, 1908).

Thank you taking the time to read through such a lenghty post.

Dennis

 

 

Submitted byEEon Sun, 11/25/2012 - 16:23

Dennis, a confession has to be made here. Realistically, if EE works through all the issues in this post, there won't be time to answer the shorter queries others have posed--or the other queries you've raised under other topics. However, your first question can be easily answered:

Q: Is the year part of a directory title?

A. It depends upon the title the compiler assigned. As with any other book, we take our title from the book's title page.

Submitted bynewonashon Thu, 11/29/2012 - 15:39

I'm sorry for the very long post.  Hopefully, you'll let me ask my questions in much smaller posts.

I am working with an online image of a directory entitled:  "The Boston Directory [etc.]"  Thus, the compiler's and/or publisher's name is not part of the title.  Thus it wouldn't be redundant to include an author's name in a reference note.  In this case the publisher was Sampson, Murdock, & Company.  Unlike most of the online images of directory title pages that I've seen, the title page for this particular directory does not say above the publication information "compiled and published by".

With no author or compiler's name showing on the title page (as part of the title or otherwise), and no other indication given, can we assume that the directory publisher was also the directory compiler?  That is, may I treat, in this example, Sampson, Murdock, & Company as the compiler, so as to come up with a reference note similar to the following:

Sampson, Murdock, & Company, The Boston Directory Containing the City Record, a Directory of the Citizens, Business Directory and Street Directory, for 1893 (Boston: Sampson, Murdock, & Company, 1893).

Submitted byEEon Thu, 11/29/2012 - 19:15

Dennis: If no author or compiler is named on the title page, it is not standard practice to substitute the name of the publisher. We can't assume that the two are the same. EE 12.11 treats books with "anonymous" authors.

Submitted bynewonashon Fri, 11/30/2012 - 14:03

Here is one of my citations:

Boston Directory, for the Year 1858, Embracing the City Record, a General Directory of the Citizens, and a Business Directory (Boston: Adams, Sampson & Co., 1858), 180, entry for "Hickok (Gideon) & ' Prosser (Levi)"; digital images, fold3 (http://www.fold3.com/document/78728902 : accessed 18 November 2012).

Should I keep the italics inside the quoted directory entry?

Should I keep the typo apostrophe inside the quoted entry?

Generally, my understanding has been that by using quotation marks one is copying exactly.

Submitted byEEon Fri, 11/30/2012 - 15:38

Dennis, given that it's just not possible for EE to design custom citations for every user or to "approve" citations for every user, our emphasis in this forum on the application of principles that researchers struggle to understand From that perspective we need to ask: How does this situation not fit EE's guidance on (a) the use of italics, and (b) the copying of quoted matter?