Citation Issues

I found a probate packet related to the Sale of Real Estate from 1841 on Ancestry. It contains several documents and I'd like to cite each of them separately but I  am not exactly sure  I know how to make I show that it's part of a packet. I looked at 10.31 and 10.33 for inspiration and if I understand it correctly I would name the packet first and then the document of interest.

I'd like some clarification around the citing of newspapers related to place of publication, specifically in first reference notes.

Looking at EE 14.11 for newspapers:  Location is required. When a paper carries either a city or state in its masthead title (but not both), put the missing place name in parentheses within the title. If the title carries no place name, add a place name in parentheses, setting the added material in italics also. 

Dear Editor,

This is my first attempt at citing any Map!

I have read 12.67 Historical Maps but wanted your opinion on the way I have used a waypoint path to find this map, and also the information I have included regarding the publisher. Should anyone else mentioned at the bottom of the map be mentioned in the citation?

You might like to follow the path as provided (to see if you can locate the same in the same manner as what I did), but here is a link directly to the page:  https://maps.nls.uk/view/74426836  

I have been transcribing some documents that I either photographed myself at Gloucestershire Archives (UK) in 2019 but also others where I had previously paid a local researcher to photo on my behalf (who provided photos of the archive detail of the record, of the relevant box or folder or whatever).

My question relates mainly to the transcriptions of these documents.

Lately, I have been doing some digital scrapbook pages that I hope to share with cousins (or post at FamilySearch or Wikitree) and have attached a single page of one to give you an idea of these.

Hello Editor,

It's been a while since I have posted here.

I was wanting your opinion of a record I purchased from an OS archive, that was sent to me as an email attachment, late last year.

This is my current attempt at citing this document.

I'm starting to create subsequent notes for many of my full references. There's something I'm not clear on while reading the examples for many of the different records. When creating a subsequent note for lets say an online baptism found on ancestry, are you putting in the subsequent note where the original record can be found? or are you simply just restating what the record is for from the first reference? 

This is my working citation:

Full reference note:

I had found some Naturalization records for a family member online at Ancestry all within the same database. An application for admission, an oath and a petition.

Here's an example: https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/2280/images/32955_2421406261_0436-00228?

This should be an easy one to resolve. I have read through the chapter in EE on cemetery records (best book I ever purchased for research - I love it!) and I think I am almost there for a citation for the following grave. The grave is in a rural area but it has a street address. Civilization in getting closer to the grave so it's almost semi-rural now I guess. The grave itself consists of a headstone and a raised concrete border surrounds the grave with crushed granite filling the grave. The headstone is of granite and engraved.

Looking for some guidance on citing certain items in an unindexed and unnumbered probate file from 1872 Catawba County, North Carolina found on FamilySearch.  Searched the content here and found reference to EE 10.33.  From that I have come up with the following for citations to those items:

I though I had an understanding on citations until I found some images that are not indexed on ancestry. I did some reading in the book evidence explained but I think I am overthinking this and just confused myself.   

The information is found on ancestry, but is not indexed.  I used the following citation but I think I completely missed the mark on this one. The information I retrieved from the image was the appointment of an admin. of the estate of Jonathan Ratcliff.