Forums
I'm trying to follow Edition 4, using Template 10 for online images. Here is what I have for an initial footnote.
Church of England (Clarendon, Pontiac, Quebec, Canada), Parish register, B. M. S., including 1919, fo. 239, Burial Wilson, burial of Elizah Ann Wilson (died 2 Aug 1919), 4 Aug 1919; imaged, "Drouin Collection records © 2022," Drouin Institute, Généalogie Québec (https://www.genealogiequebec.com/membership/en/fonds-drouin/REGISTRES : 5 Jul 2022), Québec > Registres non-catholiques 1760-1979 > Township of Clarendon (Church of England) > 1910 > 1919, image M122_37_1338.jpg.
I realize I have to do work on this citation as a whole, but the actual issue at hand is that Genealogy Quebec has "sliced up" the parish registers to fit into a hierarchy of directories by decade and year. Consequently; it is almost impossible to find the date range spanned by the volume one is consulting, let alone a title page. Is using "Parish register, B. M. S., including 1919" for a user-supplied title adequate?
History-Hunter, we feel your…
History-Hunter, we feel your pain in using those "sliced-up" records. We see that frequently now at FamilySearch, as well—particularly with county-level civil records.
In this case, the records you are using are behind a paywall. I do not subscribe and cannot access them in order to analyze the architecture of the website or nuances of the collection, both of which I would need to do before making an informed opinion.
On the basis of what you present, two issues pop to mind:
1. Is the generic "Church of England" the name of the local church/parish at "Clarendon, Pontiac, Quebec, Canada" or is there a specific parish name?
2. What do those initials "B.M.S." stand for? Less experienced users of your work are likely not to know. If you were citing a French-Catholic church, then readers experienced with those records would quickly guess "Baptêmes, Mariages, Sépultres"; but since you are citing "Church of England," most would automatically expect the abbreviations to stand for English words. "Baptisms" and "marriages" would come to mind, but not "burials." Bottom line: It's better not to require users of our work to guess at what we mean.
On the latter point (and abbreviations in generation), see EE4 §2.30 "Reducing ... Source Citations to Acronyms & Initialisms," particularly the sentence: "Each abbreviated form should be fully identified the first time it appears."
On the overarching issue of how to handle the sliced-up records, rather than cite the local parish and a record name that you've had to make up, Evidence Style would likely default to citing the online provider in Layer 1:
"Database Title," Website Creator, Title of Website (Publication Place = URL : Date) > Path > Image No. > Specific Item details;
and then use Layer 2 to cite what the provider tells us about the original record and where to find it. But, again, without being able to study the website for myself, this answer is a generalized one.