Dear Editor,
Yes, I am back, but with a, I hope, generic question. As you may know, I am fighting, no working with my genealogy database management software program.
I'm having some difficulty understanding the difference between Online Database (Ancestry) and Online Images (Ancestry), which have different "First Reference Notes" (EE 6.19). I understand the citations, but when should I use Database versus Images?
Evidence Explained:
Dear Editor,
I have a question about a Census Record has a Household at the bottom of one page, and the Household continues at the top of the next.
I cite my Census Records by Household, but that might be a different topic, in doing so, I was able to identify the name of a 2nd wife, because her children from a previous marriage were listed in the household being related to the Father, her 2nd husband, as Step (daughter, son).
My question is, what if that Household is on two pages? Do I do this:
I have a copy of a cemetery record that is an application for service (EE 5.8) but includes interment location (EE 5.7) and names the purchaser (EE 5.9).
Unlike the example in EE 5.8, this application was made by the next of kin, not the mortuary firm.
I would like to use this application to capture the interment location so I tacked it on at the end of an EE 5.8 citation:
River View Cemetery Association (Portland, Oregon), application for interment of Charles W. Roggy, submitted by Helene Roggy, 19 Oct 1981. Interment listed as niche 704, corridor 16.
Hi,
I'm not at all an historian, but I'm a writer who is extremely interested in history.
I've started a history book that begins with how the earth originally formed (billions of years ago). How do I write about this topic legally, since there are no original documents and I'm not an expert? So far I've been reading multiple websites, and writing in my own words.
Also, what determines when I have to cite websites I've read?
Thanks!
Kara
Dear editor,
In the Netherlands, repositories are increasingly putting their finding aids online including scans of the original records. We use these scans just like we would originals: we browse the finding aid, following the hierarchy down to the document we like to consult, and then instead of asking the archivist to get the document for us, we click through to the scans.
I'm trying to come up with a citation for a book at the HathiTrust Digital Library website:
http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/011985446.
It is a combination of abstracts of trial court documents in a particular case. The case was appealed to the Wisconsin State Supreme Court. I'm not sure whether this book was filed with the Court as part of the appeal or whether it was printed later by the plaintiffs/appellants, who were also the publishers.
I wish to cite the 1895 Wisconsin state census found at Ancestry.com.
The image of the page (that has no number) that I wish to cite has a heading that is not filled in:
"Enumeration of the Inhabitants in the ________________ of __________________ in the County of _________________, State of Wisconsin, on the 20th day of June, A. D. 1895.
Based on the information that Ancestry.com provides, my citation is:
I subscribe to Ancestry.com but used HeritageQuest for quite a number of my citations for images of the US Federal Census when the image at Ancestry.com was illegible or other issues existed.
The images on HeritageQuest are now being sourced by Ancestry. The images that HeritageQuest had provided *are no longer available*.
This is a concern because:
We just completed a panel review of Genealogy & the Law: Guide to Legal Sources for the Family Historian by Kay Haviland Freilish & William B. Freilich [available at http://www.ngsgenealogy.org/cs/genealogy_and_the_law] on the dearMyrtle Google+ Groups [youtube videos of each session are archived]. After spending 8 weeks it became clear that legal citations were not the same as genealogy citations citing federal & state statutes. I have searched Evidence Explained site and QuickTips #5 has a few examples in the footnotes, but none that actually cite the statute.
